text.skipToContent text.skipToNavigation

Corporate Divestiture Management Organizational Techniques for Proactive Divestiture Decision-Making von Sewing, Jan-Hendrik (eBook)

  • Erscheinungsdatum: 20.04.2010
  • Verlag: Gabler Verlag
eBook (PDF)
79,72 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar

Online verfügbar

Corporate Divestiture Management

Jan-Hendrik Sewing makes a significant contribution to opening the black box of current divestiture decision-making. He uses detailed case studies, including numerous interviews with corporate executives and experts from management consulting, private equity, and investment banking. The author develops a conceptual framework to identify remedies to behavioral pathologies and their origins. The study highlights multiple techniques for pursuing divestitures proactively and formulates best-practice recommendations. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Sewing finished his doctoral thesis at the Dortmund University of Technology, Chair for Strategic and International Management.


    Format: PDF
    Kopierschutz: AdobeDRM
    Seitenzahl: 266
    Erscheinungsdatum: 20.04.2010
    Sprache: Englisch
    ISBN: 9783834986610
    Verlag: Gabler Verlag
    Serie: Research
    Größe: 3196 kBytes
Weiterlesen weniger lesen

Corporate Divestiture Management

2 Foundations for understanding the divestiture phenomenon under analysis (S. 28-29)

This chapter is intended to help sharpen understanding of the divestiture phenomenon dealt with in this project. What characterizes the specific divestiture option being analyzed? Are divestitures a relatively new phenomenon, and how did it evolve? Where do divestitures fit within strategic management, and what are the implications?

2.1 Definition and scope of the term

Trying to access the term via its impact, "divestiture" and "to divest" suggest the opposite of "investment" and "to invest". When contemplated as a negative investment, divestitures cancel the financial and business impact of investments (cf. Wöhler 1981, p.8). However, definitions of investment vary in the literature (see, e.g., Eich 1978, p.828ff., Priewasser 1972, p.11-18). As this study neither aims to develop a general, binding definition of the term nor discuss all related concepts from previous literature, the focus here is on presenting a definition that sharpens the scope of analysis. Releasing financial and business resources can happen gradually, cashing out through the sales process, i.e., "partial divestiture", or through a definite one-time act, potentially including the receipt of directly related proceeds, i.e., "residual divestiture" (cf. Wöhler 1981, p.16).

Although "cash-out" or "harvesting" strategies eventually have a divestiture effect, they do not focus on the disposal but on the optimization of future related cash-flows (cf. Harrigan 1989, p.40ff.). In practice, cash-out activities can thus also be found without final discrete decisions on respective market exits. The degree of strategic relevance is strongly related to the scope of the divestiture object itself. In the case of whole subsidiaries - business units, for instance - divestiture considerations are the responsibility of corporate management. Business portfolio matrices coined the term "divestiture strategy", which stands for the disposal of businesses or strategic business entities (SBE) operating in specific markets (Duhaime/Patton 1980).

This characterization factors out the release of smaller assets, such as single plants or patents, or the sale of capital stakes and financial investments. Furthermore, divestitures could be partial or complete, the key difference being the resulting degree of change of ownership. To differentiate business unit disposals here from practices like franchising and outsourcing, the degree of sustainability and accrual of financial funds also need to be considered.In terms of underlying reason and logic for divestiture, voluntary and involuntary divestitures can be differentiated. In the latter case, a corporation can be forced to divest, typically for nationalization or regulatory reasons.

Voluntary decisions could take place in a proactive manner, seizing strategic opportunities, or reactively in the face of concrete problems or even crises. For this study the focus is on a) voluntary, residual divestiture decisions, including organizational entities like entire business units, divisions and segments, which can be b) permanently unbundled as self-dependent business entities under c) new ownership:

Weiterlesen weniger lesen